Written for independent consultants, fractional executives and small consulting firms that use employees or subcontractors.
The short version
- Promise care, not results, and cap liability.Commit to the professional standard of care. Keep indemnities (promises to cover losses) mutual, for third-party claims only, and inside the cap unless separately insured.
- Hand over named deliverables only, on payment.Transfer them by signed assignment once paid, and license your existing tools and templates instead of giving them away.
- Strike any noncompete your state bans.California voids covered noncompetes and Minnesota bans them, for example. Elsewhere, have counsel narrow them to the protectable interest, activity, area and shortest supportable time.
Client paper is written for the client. In a consulting MSA, the clauses that matter most are the standard of care, the liability cap and indemnities, who owns the work product, and any restriction on who you can work for next. Have an attorney licensed in the governing-law state review any change to the cap, indemnity or IP.
Caps are often enforced, within state limits
Commercial liability caps are often enforced, but New York will not enforce a cap or exclusion against gross negligence or willful misconduct, and California bars exemption for fraud, willful injury or violation of law.
Kalisch-Jarcho v. City of New York, 58 N.Y.2d 377 (1983); Cal. Civ. Code 1668
Promise the professional standard of care, not a result. Article 2 of the UCC applies to goods, so disclaim implied warranties conspicuously for any goods or software you supply. Texas enforces an indemnity for the other party's negligence only when it is express and conspicuous. Keep indemnities mutual, limited to third-party claims and inside the cap unless separately insured.
- Refuse pay-when-paid terms and unilateral set-off of disputed or unrelated sums.
- Consulting ordinarily gives you no mechanics' lien (California's design-professional lien is the exception), so ask for an advance or retainer, milestone billing and a purchase order before work starts.
- If you work alone, New York's Freelance Isn't Free Act covers you even through a one-person LLC, from $800 with the same client over 120 days, and California's Freelance Worker Protection Act starts at $250 on the same 120-day basis. Both require a written contract and payment by the agreed date or the applicable 30-day default, subject to exclusions (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law 1410 and 1412; Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 18101). As of Oct 2026.
- Refuse insurance demands beyond the limit you have priced, and control terms inconsistent with independent delivery.
- Match your E&O tail to the written-contract limitation period: four years in California and Texas, six in New York and five in Florida. As of Oct 2026.
Who owns the work
Work made for hire rarely covers consulting deliverables
A contractor's work is made for hire only if it falls in one of nine statutory categories and a signed agreement says so. Most reports, models and code do not, so they pass only by a signed written assignment.
17 U.S.C. 101 and 204(a); Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989)
- Assign named deliverables on payment, and license your pre-existing materials.
- In California, a work-made-for-hire clause signed with an individual can make that person an employee for workers' compensation and unemployment insurance. Use assignment language instead.
- A confidentiality agreement with an individual contractor needs the federal trade-secret whistleblower notice (18 U.S.C. 1833(b)).
Noncompetes: the state decides
- California voids covered noncompetes (Bus. & Prof. Code 16600).
- Minnesota bans them for employees and independent contractors (Stat. 181.988, from July 1, 2023).
- Wyoming generally voids covenants entered on or after July 1, 2025, with statutory exceptions such as a business sale, trade secrets and executive or management personnel (W.S. 1-23-108).
- Washington voids a noncompete below an earnings threshold: As of Oct 2026, $317,147.09 for independent contractors and $126,858.83 for employees, with a near-total ban scheduled from June 30, 2027 (RCW 49.62).
- Texas enforces a reasonable covenant ancillary to an otherwise enforceable agreement (Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 15.50), Florida enforces under Fla. Stat. 542.335 with statutory presumptions, and New York applies reasonableness.
- The FTC's nationwide noncompete rule is not law: it was set aside in August 2024, and the FTC dropped its appeals on September 5, 2025. As of Oct 2026.
Neither the industry-wide ban nor a reflex fallback to named clients or 12 months is safe: the restriction has to fit the actual interest, and in some states it is void anyway.
Asked in Greymill
1. Noncompete: California voids covered noncompetes (Bus. & Prof. Code 16600). Ask them to delete it.
2. Liability: ask for a cap. Promise the professional standard of care, not a result.
Indemnities (promises to cover the other side's losses): mutual, limited to third-party claims and inside the cap unless separately insured.
3. Ownership: most reports, models and code pass to a client only by a signed written assignment. Assign just the named deliverables, on payment. License your old templates rather than giving them away.
Have an attorney licensed in the governing-law state review the cap, indemnity and IP changes.
Say the word and I'll draft the markup, clause by clause, with the reason for each.
Ask it about your own business
Paste this into Greymill with your own figures, and Contracts & Disputes works it through for your business.
I run a consulting business in [state], in the US. A client in [state] has sent its MSA and SOW for [engagement] worth [fee]. My E&O limit is [amount]. Here are the liability, indemnity, IP, payment and restrictive covenant clauses: [paste]. Mark up what to change for the governing-law state, with proposed wording and the reason for each change.
More for consulting and advisory in the US
- My hourly rate looks fine, but fixed fees and retainers keep running overYour rate only means something once you count unbilled hours, write-downs and the extra days a fixed fee or retainer quietly absorbs.Read the lesson
- Should my consulting LLC elect S corporation status, and what does that do to QBI and my retirement plan?For consultants, the S election, the phase-out of the qualified business income (QBI) deduction for service businesses and the retirement plan interact, so the headline payroll tax saving is only the start of the answer.Read the lesson
- Can I take a success fee for introducing investors, or advise on a client's 401(k) menu?Investment advice, finder fees, legal drafting, immigration work and health data each sit behind a federal or state line, so check before you take on the work next door.Read the lesson
- Can my consulting firm bring in other consultants as 1099 subcontractors?A consulting firm that subcontracts consulting work meets the strictest version of the classification tests, especially in California, so check before the first SOW.Read the lesson
- Winning government consulting work without being shut out by a conflictGovernment work rewards consultants who register early, pick the right route in, and keep clear of organizational conflicts of interest.Read the lesson
- A spoofed email diverted a payment, or a claim arrived after my E&O stoppedTwo consulting losses that land in the gaps between policies: a wire sent to a fraudster without social engineering cover, and a claim on old advice after the E&O has lapsed.Read the lesson
Open the interactive lesson · Every consulting and advisory lesson · What Greymill knows about the trade
Sources
The primary sources behind this lesson, checked Oct 2026.
- UCC 2-316 (Msa and sow terms, caps and indemnities)
- opinion (Msa and sow terms, caps and indemnities)
- s.1668 (Msa and sow terms, caps and indemnities)
- 17 U.S.C. 101, 204(a); 490 U.S. 730 (1989) (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
- 18 U.S.C. 1836; 1833(b) (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
- s.181.988 (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
- 2025 Wyoming Session Laws Ch.170, W.S.1-23-108(a)(i) to (iv), effective-date section (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
- RCW 49.62; ESHB 1155 (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
- C.R.S. 8-2-113 (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
- NY GBS 1410(3), 1412; CA BPC 18101 threshold and scope (Getting paid and collections)
- CCP 116.220, 116.221; Tex. Gov. Code 27.031; NY UCCA 1801-A; Fla. Sm. Cl. R. 7.010 (Getting paid and collections)
- Civ. Code 8300 (Getting paid and collections)
- each statute as cited (Federal, state or local: say which)