The client's MSA wants unlimited liability, a noncompete and everything I have ever built

Greymill AcademyUS5 min readReviewed Oct 202613 primary sourcesUK version

The short answer

Consulting MSAs hurt owners in three places: liability and indemnities, ownership of the work, and restrictive covenants that may not be enforceable in your state at all.

The takeaway. Promise the professional standard of care, cap liability and indemnities, assign only named deliverables on payment by signed assignment, and delete noncompetes your state prohibits.

Play the interactive lesson

Written for independent consultants, fractional executives and small consulting firms that use employees or subcontractors.

The short version

  1. Promise care, not results, and cap liability.Commit to the professional standard of care. Keep indemnities (promises to cover losses) mutual, for third-party claims only, and inside the cap unless separately insured.
  2. Hand over named deliverables only, on payment.Transfer them by signed assignment once paid, and license your existing tools and templates instead of giving them away.
  3. Strike any noncompete your state bans.California voids covered noncompetes and Minnesota bans them, for example. Elsewhere, have counsel narrow them to the protectable interest, activity, area and shortest supportable time.

Client paper is written for the client. In a consulting MSA, the clauses that matter most are the standard of care, the liability cap and indemnities, who owns the work product, and any restriction on who you can work for next. Have an attorney licensed in the governing-law state review any change to the cap, indemnity or IP.

The rule

Caps are often enforced, within state limits

Commercial liability caps are often enforced, but New York will not enforce a cap or exclusion against gross negligence or willful misconduct, and California bars exemption for fraud, willful injury or violation of law.

Kalisch-Jarcho v. City of New York, 58 N.Y.2d 377 (1983); Cal. Civ. Code 1668

Promise the professional standard of care, not a result. Article 2 of the UCC applies to goods, so disclaim implied warranties conspicuously for any goods or software you supply. Texas enforces an indemnity for the other party's negligence only when it is express and conspicuous. Keep indemnities mutual, limited to third-party claims and inside the cap unless separately insured.

  • Refuse pay-when-paid terms and unilateral set-off of disputed or unrelated sums.
  • Consulting ordinarily gives you no mechanics' lien (California's design-professional lien is the exception), so ask for an advance or retainer, milestone billing and a purchase order before work starts.
  • If you work alone, New York's Freelance Isn't Free Act covers you even through a one-person LLC, from $800 with the same client over 120 days, and California's Freelance Worker Protection Act starts at $250 on the same 120-day basis. Both require a written contract and payment by the agreed date or the applicable 30-day default, subject to exclusions (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law 1410 and 1412; Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 18101). As of Oct 2026.
  • Refuse insurance demands beyond the limit you have priced, and control terms inconsistent with independent delivery.
  • Match your E&O tail to the written-contract limitation period: four years in California and Texas, six in New York and five in Florida. As of Oct 2026.

Who owns the work

The rule

Work made for hire rarely covers consulting deliverables

A contractor's work is made for hire only if it falls in one of nine statutory categories and a signed agreement says so. Most reports, models and code do not, so they pass only by a signed written assignment.

17 U.S.C. 101 and 204(a); Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989)

  • Assign named deliverables on payment, and license your pre-existing materials.
  • In California, a work-made-for-hire clause signed with an individual can make that person an employee for workers' compensation and unemployment insurance. Use assignment language instead.
  • A confidentiality agreement with an individual contractor needs the federal trade-secret whistleblower notice (18 U.S.C. 1833(b)).

Noncompetes: the state decides

  • California voids covered noncompetes (Bus. & Prof. Code 16600).
  • Minnesota bans them for employees and independent contractors (Stat. 181.988, from July 1, 2023).
  • Wyoming generally voids covenants entered on or after July 1, 2025, with statutory exceptions such as a business sale, trade secrets and executive or management personnel (W.S. 1-23-108).
  • Washington voids a noncompete below an earnings threshold: As of Oct 2026, $317,147.09 for independent contractors and $126,858.83 for employees, with a near-total ban scheduled from June 30, 2027 (RCW 49.62).
  • Texas enforces a reasonable covenant ancillary to an otherwise enforceable agreement (Tex. Bus. & Com. Code 15.50), Florida enforces under Fla. Stat. 542.335 with statutory presumptions, and New York applies reasonableness.
  • The FTC's nationwide noncompete rule is not law: it was set aside in August 2024, and the FTC dropped its appeals on September 5, 2025. As of Oct 2026.
AvoidAccepting a clause that you will not work for 'any company in the client's industry' for 12 months.
Do this insteadDeleting the noncompete where your state prohibits it, and elsewhere having counsel narrow it to the protectable interest, covered activity, geography and shortest supportable duration.

Neither the industry-wide ban nor a reflex fallback to named clients or 12 months is safe: the restriction has to fit the actual interest, and in some states it is void anyway.

Asked in Greymill

Example question and answer from Contracts & Disputes
You
Big client sent their MSA. Unlimited liability. No work for anyone in their industry for 12 months. They own all my work, even my old templates. I'm a solo consultant in California. The client's here too. Signed by Friday, they say. Can I just sign?
Contracts & Disputes
Don't sign it as written. Ask for three changes before Friday.

1. Noncompete: California voids covered noncompetes (Bus. & Prof. Code 16600). Ask them to delete it.

2. Liability: ask for a cap. Promise the professional standard of care, not a result.
Indemnities (promises to cover the other side's losses): mutual, limited to third-party claims and inside the cap unless separately insured.

3. Ownership: most reports, models and code pass to a client only by a signed written assignment. Assign just the named deliverables, on payment. License your old templates rather than giving them away.

Have an attorney licensed in the governing-law state review the cap, indemnity and IP changes.

Say the word and I'll draft the markup, clause by clause, with the reason for each.

Play this demo in the Academy

Ask it about your own business

Paste this into Greymill with your own figures, and Contracts & Disputes works it through for your business.

Your question

I run a consulting business in [state], in the US. A client in [state] has sent its MSA and SOW for [engagement] worth [fee]. My E&O limit is [amount]. Here are the liability, indemnity, IP, payment and restrictive covenant clauses: [paste]. Mark up what to change for the governing-law state, with proposed wording and the reason for each change.

Start free trialHow it works7 days free with every specialist. No card needed.

More for consulting and advisory in the US

Open the interactive lesson · Every consulting and advisory lesson · What Greymill knows about the trade

Sources

The primary sources behind this lesson, checked Oct 2026.

  1. UCC 2-316 (Msa and sow terms, caps and indemnities)
  2. opinion (Msa and sow terms, caps and indemnities)
  3. s.1668 (Msa and sow terms, caps and indemnities)
  4. 17 U.S.C. 101, 204(a); 490 U.S. 730 (1989) (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
  5. 18 U.S.C. 1836; 1833(b) (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
  6. s.181.988 (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
  7. 2025 Wyoming Session Laws Ch.170, W.S.1-23-108(a)(i) to (iv), effective-date section (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
  8. RCW 49.62; ESHB 1155 (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
  9. C.R.S. 8-2-113 (Work product, ip and restrictive covenants)
  10. NY GBS 1410(3), 1412; CA BPC 18101 threshold and scope (Getting paid and collections)
  11. CCP 116.220, 116.221; Tex. Gov. Code 27.031; NY UCCA 1801-A; Fla. Sm. Cl. R. 7.010 (Getting paid and collections)
  12. Civ. Code 8300 (Getting paid and collections)
  13. each statute as cited (Federal, state or local: say which)

Ready to try Greymill?

Sixteen specialists who already know your trade and your country, sharing one memory of your business.

7 days free with every specialist. No card needed.

Continue with GoogleTry the demo, no sign-up