HMRC says VAT is due on the whole fee, and a cleaner says she was a worker

Greymill AcademyUK6 min readReviewed Oct 202622 primary sourcesUS version

The short answer

A domestic cleaning agency or app that sets the price, takes the money and promises the clean is usually the principal and often the employer, whatever the paperwork says, and the VAT and pay bills follow.

The takeaway. Who sets the price, takes the money and promises the clean decides both VAT and status. Be a real employer or a real agency; paperwork alone changes neither.

Play the interactive lesson

Written for owners of UK cleaning businesses: contract cleaners for offices, schools, healthcare and soft FM subcontracts, domestic cleaning firms, agencies and apps, and specialists in after-builders, end-of-tenancy, window, carpet and biohazard cleaning.

The short version

  1. Check who sets prices and takes payment.If you set the price, take the money and promise the clean, you are usually the principal, selling the cleaning itself, and often the employer.
  2. Get both advisers and cost the back bill.Use a VAT adviser and an employment solicitor together. Cost back VAT on the whole fee, plus minimum wage, holiday pay and pension.
  3. Pick one model and change how you run.Employ the cleaners properly, or run a real agency where cleaners agree their own prices and can send substitutes. Paperwork alone fails.

Picture a domestic cleaning app. You set the price, customers pay you, and your 40 cleaners invoice you as self-employed. Then two letters arrive: HMRC says VAT is due on the whole fee, and a former cleaner says she was a worker. Both turn on the same facts, so deal with them together.

The three models the law recognises

  • Introductory agency: introduces self-employed cleaners to households, which engage and pay them; the agency earns an introduction fee or commission.
  • Employment business: engages the cleaners as employees or workers and supplies them to work under the household's direction, and must give a key information document before terms are agreed.
  • Employer: employs the cleaners and sells cleaning as its own service. Most app businesses that set the price, take the money and promise the clean are this in substance, whatever the paperwork says.
The rule

Status: the label does not decide

Tribunals look at the reality. Car valeters labelled self-employed were held to be workers, and so were drivers on a platform that set fares, controlled terms and rated them. Personal service with only a limited right to substitute points to worker status; a genuine, unfettered right to send a substitute defeated it for Deliveroo riders.

Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41; Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5; Pimlico Plumbers Ltd v Smith [2018] UKSC 29; IWGB v CAC (Deliveroo) [2023] UKSC 43

In cleaning, the red flags are that the business sets the price and the rota, issues checklists, rates and deactivates cleaners, and bars them from working for customers directly. If the cleaners are workers, they are owed the minimum wage for all working time including travel between houses, 5.6 weeks' holiday, and auto-enrolment; employees also get sick pay, notice and dismissal rights. Unlawful deduction claims reach back at most 2 years (Employment Rights Act 1996 s.23(4A)), but minimum wage enforcement is not limited that way.

The VAT question: principal or agent

A principal supplies the cleaning itself, so the whole fee counts towards the £90,000 registration threshold and carries 20% VAT once registered. A genuine agent supplies an introduction or booking service, so only its commission is its turnover. Signs of a principal: you set the price, take payment in your own name, promise the result and organise re-cleans. Signs of an agent: the household contracts with the named cleaner, the cleaner agrees the price, and you take a disclosed commission. Start with the contracts and check they reflect the economic reality (Secret Hotels2 Ltd v HMRC [2014] UKSC 16). As of Oct 2026.

40 cleaners, £600,000 of VAT-inclusive fees a year (worked, As of Oct 2026)
VAT as a genuine agent: on a 20% commission of £120,000£20,000
Extra VAT as principal£80,000
VAT as principal: one sixth of £600,000£100,000

Assumes 40 cleaners at £15,000 of customer fees each, fees that include VAT, and prices that cannot rise.

AvoidRewriting the cleaner agreements to say "self-employed contractor" and "agent" while the app still sets prices, rotas and ratings.
Do this insteadChoosing a model and living it: either employ the cleaners with contracts, payroll and prices that carry VAT and on-costs, or run a real agency where households contract with cleaners who agree their own prices, can refuse work and send substitutes, and you invoice a commission.

Paper changes without behaviour changes fail (Autoclenz).

  1. Get both advisers together.A VAT adviser and an employment solicitor at the same time, because the same facts decide both questions.
  2. Model the back bill.Back VAT on the whole fee, plus the pay claim: minimum wage including travel between houses, holiday pay and pension.
  3. Restructure in substance.Pick the employer model or the real agency model, and change how the business actually runs, not just the paperwork.
  4. Ask before the threshold next time.For a large principal or agent question, a VAT adviser can seek an HMRC non-statutory clearance before you cross the threshold.

An agency or employment business must not charge cleaners a fee for finding them work (Employment Agencies Act 1973 s.6). A "registration", "app" or "kit" fee charged to cleaners is a breach, whatever else the model gets right.

Asked in Greymill

Example question and answer from Staff & HR
You
My domestic cleaning app has 40 cleaners who invoice us as self-employed. We set the prices, take the payments and rate them. Customers pay us £600,000 a year and we keep 20%. If I rewrite the agreements to say contractor and agent, are we covered?
Staff & HR
No. New paperwork without new behaviour fails (the Autoclenz case). While the app sets prices, takes the money and rates the cleaners, your VAT and their status follow what really happens.

The VAT at stake if you cannot put prices up (As of Oct 2026):
As principal, selling the cleaning: one sixth of £600,000 = £100,000
As a genuine agent, on your 20% commission: one sixth of £120,000 = £20,000
Difference: £80,000 a year

On pay: if they are workers, they are owed the minimum wage for all working time, travel between houses included, plus holiday pay and pension auto-enrolment.

Pick one model and live it: employ them properly, or run a real agency where households contract with cleaners who agree their own prices, can refuse work and send substitutes.

Bring in a VAT adviser and an employment solicitor together. Shall I ask MARCUS to set out the VAT side?

Play this demo in the Academy

Ask it about your own business

Paste this into Greymill with your own figures, and Staff & HR works it through for your business.

Your question

I run a cleaning business in the UK. We are a domestic cleaning [agency or app] with [number] cleaners who [invoice us as self-employed, or are employed]. We [do or do not] set the price, take payment in our own name, and set rotas, checklists and ratings, and customers contract with [us or the named cleaner]. Customer fees are about [amount] a year and we keep [commission or margin]. Tell me whether we look like principal or agent for VAT and whether the cleaners look like workers, estimate the exposure, and set out both ways to restructure.

Start free trialHow it works7 days free with every specialist. No card needed.

More for cleaning and facilities in the UK

Open the interactive lesson · Every cleaning and facilities lesson · What Greymill knows about the trade

Sources

The primary sources behind this lesson, checked Oct 2026.

  1. s.13(2), (3) (Domestic cleaning: agency, employment business or employer)
  2. reg 13A (Domestic cleaning: agency, employment business or employer)
  3. s.6 (Domestic cleaning: agency, employment business or employer)
  4. Autoclenz [2011] UKSC 41; Uber [2021] UKSC 5; Pimlico [2018] UKSC 29; Deliveroo [2023] UKSC 43 (Domestic cleaning: agency, employment business or employer)
  5. s.23(4A) (Domestic cleaning: agency, employment business or employer)
  6. HMRC v Secret Hotels2 Ltd [2014] UKSC 16 (the earlier supremecourt.uk URL opened a different case, Al-Jedda) (Domestic cleaning: agency, employment business or employer)
  7. regs 30(b), 36, 39(1) (Hard cases: pay, tax, domestic and site)
  8. reg 16A (Hard cases: pay, tax, domestic and site)
  9. regs 4(2), 9(b) (Hard cases: pay, tax, domestic and site)
  10. WAHR 2005; RIDDOR reg 4 (Hard cases: pay, tax, domestic and site)
  11. Civil penalties (Hard cases: pay, tax, domestic and site)
  12. Rynda (UK) Ltd v Rhijnsburger [2015] EWCA Civ 75 (Pitfalls that embarrass the product)
  13. reg 18 (Pitfalls that embarrass the product)
  14. reg 2 (definition of work at height) (Pitfalls that embarrass the product)
  15. s.3 (Pitfalls that embarrass the product)
  16. Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2013 Sch Part 1 para 3 (Pitfalls that embarrass the product)
  17. reg 11(6) (Who must sign off: time-critical steps first)
  18. reg 13(4) (Who must sign off: time-critical steps first)
  19. www.legislation.gov.uk (Who must sign off: time-critical steps first)
  20. s.51 (Who must sign off: time-critical steps first)
  21. s.15 (Who must sign off: time-critical steps first)
  22. regs 10 and 13 (Who must sign off: time-critical steps first)

Ready to try Greymill?

Sixteen specialists who already know your trade and your country, sharing one memory of your business.

7 days free with every specialist. No card needed.

Continue with GoogleTry the demo, no sign-up